|
Fall
2005

|
|


The MaryPIRG Foundation has reissued
a report on energy markets
to counter industry proposals to increase
use of nuclear power. As
Congress creates new subsidies for
nuclear power and energy companies
propose a new reactor in Maryland,
the study demonstrates that
we can meet our energy needs and
address global warming without
building new nuclear reactors.
The MaryPIRG Foundation commissioned
the study last year together
with other state PIRGs to
detail a clean energy plan for the
country. The report, titled “A Responsible
Electricity Future,” is
available at www.marypirg.org/reports. It finds that taking advantage
of energy efficiency opportunities
could level off our growth in
electricity demand, while developing
renewable sources could slowly
replace aging power plants.
The most cost-effective efficiency
measures cost two to ten times less
than electricity generation and
transmission. Investing in
renewables and efficiency could
save $32 billion by 2020.
Maryland’s Calvert Cliffs facility is
one of six nuclear power plants nationwide
bidding for a new reactor,
the first to be built in more than
three decades. At a cost of $3 billion,
with subsidies of at least $1
billion, building a new reactor
would be a misguided energy
policy that will only deepen our
nation’s dependency on dangerous
and uneconomic energy technologies.
In addition to direct subsidies, the
nuclear energy industry has stuck
taxpayers with the tab for insuring
against disaster. The federal government
covers 98 percent of the
industry’s insurance liability. Also,
once operations end, the company
will no longer be responsible or liable
for the radioactive site.

Source: Public Citizen
Radioactive waste is probably the
most dangerous substance known,
and there is no safe place to put it.
Right now, there are 923 metric tons
of high-level radioactive waste sitting
in pools and casks right next
to the Calvert Cliffs reactors, 50
miles from our nation’s capital.
Each year, 44 tons are added.
In its “Ecology Book,” the Nuclear
Energy Industry says that Calvert
Cliffs has not adversely affected
marine life populations, even suggesting
that a little radiation is good
for oyster growth. However,
Calvert Cliffs has acknowledged
that its operations kill 250,000 blue
crabs and finfish annually. Furthermore,
plant expansion could allow
the U.S. Department of Energy to implement its plan to allow 326
barges carrying high-level nuclear
waste to criss-cross the bay.
Every potential kilowatt from a
new nuclear reactor could be
achieved through energy efficiency
at lower cost. Subsidies for clean
energy solutions of the magnitude
given to the nuclear industry would
reduce demand sharply and transform
our power system. |